Flynn applies categories of reading to the interactions that students have with text. The most basic of categorizations includes that of a reader that dominates the text, that is one who distances themselves so much from the text because of lack of interest or lack of understanding that they fail to make a concrete connection to the text. However, the converse can also be a problem where the reader becomes so involved in the text that they lack distance to give an objective assessment of the story.
"The Lottery" I felt was an interesting story, and an initially confusing one at that. I feel that the confusing elements of the story make it hard to distance yourself from the text so much that you can't understand what is going on. By making the environment that you're viewing as a reader so obscure that something just doesn't seem right, it sucks you into the story. That isn't to say that I was so emotionally entwined in the story that I couldn't objectively analyze it. This is very obvious in the analyses that were given earlier. I tried to read the story for what it is, while taking different academic angles to perhaps expose something that I hadn't seen before. Searching for themes for instance, was a great way to look for something beyond the words, while character and plot analysis gave more of an examination of the words, searching for foreshadowing perhaps.
I feel that overall, I kept a good distance from the story while still managing to engage myself in its grim atmosphere. Perhaps this was because I got to pick the story, perhaps it was because I was aware of my interaction with the story.